Is It Time for NYC to Rethink Its Affordable Housing Strategy?

For decades, New York City has leaned heavily on the private sector to build and maintain affordable housing. Billions of public dollars have been spent on tax incentives and subsidies to encourage developers to create housing, yet the crisis has only deepened. Vacancy rates are at historic lows, rents keep rising, and shelters are at capacity. Maybe it’s time for a different approach.

‍

How We Got Here

The city’s reliance on private developers began in the 1980s when Mayor Edward Koch launched a major housing initiative to build and renovate affordable apartments. Before that, the federal government played a big role in funding affordable housing, but that support dried up under the Reagan administration. Koch’s plan, and those that followed, shifted the responsibility to for-profit developers, with the city providing tax breaks and subsidies to make it worth their while.

‍

Every mayor since has followed the same basic strategy:

• Michael Bloomberg expanded on Koch’s plan with a $7.5 billion investment, relying on private developers.
• Bill de Blasio took an even bigger swing, committing nearly $17 billion to create and preserve 300,000 units—but still counting on for-profit developers to do the heavy lifting.
• Eric Adams has largely continued de Blasio’s approach, with initiatives aimed at rezoning and streamlining development.

‍

Despite these efforts, the housing crisis has worsened. Homelessness is at record highs, and apartments affordable to low-income New Yorkers are scarce to nonexistent.

‍

Does NYC Need a New Approach?

Some housing advocates argue it’s time to shift focus from private development to social housing—housing that’s not controlled by the for-profit real estate market and remains permanently affordable. This could include community land trusts, tenant-owned buildings, and expanded public housing efforts.

‍

There are already small-scale models of this approach in NYC, but they lack funding. For example:

• The Neighborhood Pillars and Open Door programs, which support community-driven housing, receive just $70 million in funding—a tiny fraction of the city’s overall housing budget.
• The Tenant Opportunity to Purchase Act, a proposed state law, would give tenants the first right to buy their building when a landlord decides to sell, preventing displacement.
• The Community Land Act would prioritize nonprofits and land trusts when public land is sold, ensuring long-term affordability.

‍

These initiatives wouldn’t solve the housing crisis overnight, but they could shift the balance toward a system where housing is treated as a home first, not just an investment.

‍

Where Do We Go From Here?

‍

Relying on private developers to fix NYC’s housing crisis has produced mixed results at best. While thousands of units have been built, affordability remains a problem, and profits often take priority over people. It’s worth asking: Would a stronger commitment to social housing, tenant ownership, and community-driven development lead to better outcomes?

‍

New York’s housing crisis didn’t happen overnight, and it won’t be solved overnight. But if the current approach isn’t working, maybe it’s time to try something new.

‍

Disclaimer: This content is meant for informational purposes only and is not intended to be construed as financial, tax, legal, or insurance advice.

‍